| 电针与帕罗西汀治疗惊恐障碍的临床疗效 |
| 投稿时间：2013-10-30 修订日期：2014-03-11 点此下载全文 |
| 引用本文：宋薇薇,晏兰,周虎.电针与帕罗西汀治疗惊恐障碍的临床疗效[J].药学实践杂志,2014,32(5):376~378 |
| 摘要点击次数: 970 |
| 全文下载次数: 117 |
|
|
| 中文摘要:目的 比较电针疗法与帕罗西汀片治疗惊恐障碍的疗效和安全性。方法 将59例随机分为电针组(30例)和帕罗西汀组(29例),疗程为4周。在治疗前及治疗1、2、4、8周时采用焦虑自评量表(SAS)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMA)、疗效指数(CGI-EI)、Barthel指数(BI)量表评定疗效和不良反应。结果 电针组总有效率为86.66%,帕罗西汀组为82.76%,两组疗效差异无统计学意义;疗效指数及起效时间两组间有显著差异,电针组起效时间短、不良反应少。结论 两种方法治疗惊恐障碍疗效相当,但电针疗法起效时间短、疗效指数高、不良反应少。 |
| 中文关键词:帕罗西汀 电针 惊恐障碍 |
| |
| Clinical efficacy for electro-acupuncture and paroxetine in treatment of panic disorder |
|
|
| Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of the treatment of panic disorder by electro-acupuncture(EA) and paroxetine.Methods 59 patients were randomly divided into paroxetine group (30 cases) and EA group (29 cases), the therapeutic course was 4 weeks. SAS, HAMA, CGI-EI, BI scale were given to evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions at 1, 2, 4 weekend before treatment and after treatment.Results EA group total effective rate was 86.66%, the paroxetine group total effective rate was 82.76%, the two groups total efficacy difference was not statistically significant; efficacy index and onset time between the two groups had significant differences.Conclusion The overall curative effects were similar in patients of the two groups, but onset short electro-acupuncture, the curative effect was high and adverse reactions were fewer. |
| keywords:paroxetine electro-acupuncture panic disorder |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
|
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
