3种药物治疗骨质疏松症的成本-效果分析
投稿时间:2012-05-03  修订日期:2012-10-29  点此下载全文
引用本文:李毓芹.3种药物治疗骨质疏松症的成本-效果分析[J].药学实践杂志,2013,31(2):143~144,150
摘要点击次数: 861
全文下载次数: 97
作者单位
李毓芹 浙江省温岭市第一人民医院, 浙江 温岭 317500 
中文摘要:目的 探讨3种药物治疗骨质疏松症的经济效果。方法 将135例患者随机分成3组,A组给予阿仑膦酸钠维D3片70 mg/2 800 IU,每周1次,晨起1片;B组给予鲑鱼降钙素鼻喷剂,每日1次,每次100 IU;C组给予唑来膦酸注射液4 mg,每年1次,3组疗程均为1年,3组患者均同时补充钙剂,进行疗效观察,并采用成本-效果分析法进行经济学分析。结果 在骨疼痛症状改善方面,A组:66.67%、B组:55.56%、C组:80.00%,C组疗效高于A组、B组,3组疗效有统计学意义(P<0.05);经济学方面,A组、B组、C组的成本效果比分别是59.52、43.61、46.70,B组优于A组、C组,但B组疗效最低。结论 C组为优选方案。
中文关键词:阿仑膦酸钠维D3  鲑鱼降钙素鼻喷剂  唑来膦酸注射液  骨质疏松症  药物经济学
 
Cost-effectiveness analysis of three kinds of drugs for osteoporosis
Abstract:Objective To investigate economic effects of three kinds of drugs in treatment of osteoporosis.Methods 135 cases were divided into three groups, A group with alendronate sodium and vitamin D3 tablets 70 mg/2 800 IU, once a week, early morning,B group with salmon calcitonin nasal spray, once a day every time 100 IU, C group with zoledronicacid injection 4 mg, once a year. All groups were treated for one year, three groups of patients were added calcium at the same time. Efficacy was observed. Cost-effectiveness analysis was used. Results In the improvement of bone pain, A group was 66.67%, B group was 55.56%, C group was 80%. C group was higher than those in group A, group B, group efficacy was statistically significant in three groups(P<0.05); The effectiveness ratio of A group, B group, C group was 59.52,43.61,46.70 respectively. B group was superior to A group and C group in the terms of economic, but group B had the lowest efficacy in all groups. Conclusion C group was the optimal solution for osteoporosis.
keywords:alendronate sodium and vitamin D3 tablets  salmon calcitonin nasal spray  zoledronicacid injection  osteoporosis  pharmaco-economics
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮